US sanctions ICC president and senior trial lawyer
The US Treasury has sanctioned International Criminal Court President Tomoko Akane and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Seye, according to reports circulated on 18 August 2026.

The United States has sanctioned International Criminal Court President Tomoko Akane and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Seye, according to reports circulated on 18 August 2026. A Reuters report relayed by War and Witness said the action concerned Akane, while Disclose.tv and OSINT Live also reported that Seye was among those targeted. The available source items do not specify the Treasury Department announcement’s publication time or provide the text of the underlying designation notice.
The immediate significance is institutional. The sanctions place the court’s president, rather than only an investigation or prosecutorial office, at the centre of a US financial restrictions decision. Monexus analysis: even without a wider historical record, the inclusion of Akane and Seye shows that Washington’s action is being presented as a direct measure against named senior figures. The source material does not establish whether the measures extend beyond these two individuals.
A measure against two senior figures
Tomoko Akane is identified in the source items as the president of the International Criminal Court. Fars News Agency described her as the Japanese head of the court, while the Reuters relay used the same institutional description. Abdoulaye Seye is identified in the Disclose.tv and OSINT Live reports as a senior trial lawyer. The available items do not specify either person’s nationality, current duties beyond the titles given, or the legal provisions invoked in the sanctions.
That limitation matters because the thread supports the names and positions, but not a full account of the decision. The reporting establishes that the US Treasury imposed sanctions on Akane and, according to several relays, on Seye. It does not provide a Treasury release, an explanation of the designation criteria, or a statement from the International Criminal Court. The narrow, supportable conclusion is therefore that two senior court figures have been sanctioned, not that the court’s entire leadership has been targeted.
What the reports establish
The Reuters account carried by War and Witness says the United States imposed sanctions on Akane according to the US Treasury Department website. A separate Disclose.tv item reports sanctions on both Akane and Seye, and OSINT Live repeats that formulation. Fars News Agency independently reports the measure against Akane, identifying her as the court’s Japanese president.
The source trail has a hierarchy. The Reuters report is relayed through a Telegram channel, while Disclose.tv and OSINT Live report the same central action and identify Seye. Fars News Agency provides separate coverage of the Akane designation, although it does not mention Seye in the supplied item. No source in the thread provides a direct link to the Treasury Department’s underlying notice. The designation’s precise legal wording therefore remains outside the evidence available here.
Monexus analysis: the common core of the reports is stronger than any one account. The Reuters relay and Fars item support the Akane action, while the Disclose.tv and OSINT Live items support the addition of Seye. That distinction should remain visible, particularly because the source items are relays and do not independently reproduce the Treasury Department record.
The institutional argument
The available reporting does not explain the US government’s stated legal or policy rationale. It does not specify whether the action concerns an investigation, a case, an official act, or a broader dispute over the court. Nor does it identify a response from the International Criminal Court, a foreign government, or the European Union.
The strongest alternative reading is consequently limited. One possibility is that the action is a targeted financial measure against named individuals. Another is that it forms part of a broader US confrontation with the court. The source items do not provide enough evidence to choose confidently between those readings, but the inclusion of the court’s president makes the second interpretation plausible. It should be described as analysis, not as an established motive.
The absence of broader context is not proof that no such context exists. The available source items simply do not specify prior sanctions, the court’s membership, its judges, its founding history, or reactions from other governments. Any account filling those gaps would go beyond the supplied evidence.
What remains contested
The central fact is the sanctions action. The supporting material is less complete on the second named official. Disclose.tv and OSINT Live identify Abdoulaye Seye as a senior trial lawyer and report that he was sanctioned, but the Reuters relay and Fars item provided here focus on Akane. The thread does not include a primary Treasury notice confirming the full designation record.
That evidentiary boundary is important. It means the article can report that the US Treasury sanctioned Akane and that several source items also identify Seye as a target. It cannot, from these materials alone, specify the sanctions’ duration, asset effects, jurisdictional reach, stated justification, or any response from The Hague.
The next reliable test will be a first-party Treasury notice or an official statement from the International Criminal Court setting out the legal basis and scope of the measures. Until such a record is available, the implications should be kept proportionate: this is a reported action against two named senior figures, with potential institutional significance but no verified account of its wider effects.
This article relies on Telegram relays, a Disclose.tv item, and Fars News Agency coverage. The available source items do not include the underlying US Treasury Department notice, so the article keeps the legal scope and institutional response explicitly limited.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/wfwitness/107472
- https://t.me/disclosetv/21729
- https://www.disclose.tv/id/tojrb24w99/@disclosetv
- https://t.me/osintlive/565132
- https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2089769373032382481
- https://t.me/farsna/456866