Bulgarian duo Grozeva and Valchanov return to Karlovy Vary with a film about corruption and pro-Russia nostalgia
Seven years after winning the Crystal Globe, the Bulgarian directing pair behind 'Gloria' return to competition with 'Black Money for White Nights,' a procedural set against post-2014 pro-Kremlin sentiment in Sofia.

Bulgarian directors Kristina Grozeva and Petar Valchanov returned to the Karlovy Vary Film Festival competition on 5 July 2026 with "Black Money for White Nights," a feature that, according to Variety's festival report, uses a corruption investigation as the entry point into a broader portrait of pro-Russia nostalgia in Sofia. The pairing places the film back in the same section that recognised them with the Crystal Globe in 2019, the festival's top prize, for "The Father." (Festival programmers did not detail the jury's deliberation.)
The new film is the duo's first competition entry at Karlovy Vary since that win, and it lands at a moment when the festival's industry programming has leaned visibly toward Eastern European directors working through the political aftermath of the post-2014 era. Variety's write-up frames the project as a procedural: an investigation into illicit finance whose trail loops through civic spaces where older Bulgarian audiences still voice sympathy for Moscow. That trajectory, sketched in Variety's reporting, mirrors a wider current in the festival's slate this year.
The Karlovy Vary platform
Karlovy Vary's competition slot has long served as a European springboard for Eastern European work, with past editions awarding films from Romania, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and the former Yugoslavia. For Bulgarian cinema specifically, the festival has functioned as a more visible stage than domestic release networks can typically offer; Bulgarian features often travel further via Central European festival prizes than through domestic distribution. Grozeva and Valchanov's 2019 win gave their subsequent projects international sales traction that domestic box office alone would not have generated, and their return to the same section, on the evidence of Variety's reporting, signals a deliberate re-engagement with the kind of social-realist register that first brought them to prominence.
The festival itself opened the week with industry sessions that, organisers said, would foreground Ukrainian production and the practical difficulties of filming under war conditions. Variety's coverage of "Black Money for White Nights" does not specify whether the film responds to that programming emphasis directly, but its release window places Bulgarian cinema adjacent to the broader regional conversation.
A Bulgarian lens on post-2014 sentiment
The subject Variety flags — pro-Russia sentiment in Bulgaria, channelled through older audiences and civic institutions — is grounded in well-documented shifts in the country's political discourse over the past decade. Bulgarian public opinion polling in the period since 2014 has consistently shown divided attitudes toward Russia and the EU, with energy dependency on Russian gas and historical affinity for Soviet-era industrial policy both cited as factors. Films set inside that tension tend to be received as diagnostic rather than didactic by festival juries, and Variety's framing of "Black Money for White Nights" places it squarely in that mode: a procedural that uses the financial trail as a way of mapping political allegiance.
Grozeva and Valchanov have previously worked in that register. "The Father," the 2019 Crystal Globe winner, examined elder-care and family disintegration through a documentary-style lens, and the duo's earlier shorts for Bulgarian television have used similar observational techniques to examine institutional failure. Variety's description of the new film's investigation format — following what it characterises as a corruption probe whose targets include figures nostalgic for the Soviet period — fits that established approach. The directors did not, in Variety's piece, frame their project as a direct response to the war in Ukraine; the political context, as Variety reports it, is structural rather than event-driven.
Procedural form, regional stakes
The choice of a corruption-investigation framework has practical consequences for how the film can travel. Procedurals travel well across European festival circuits precisely because their narrative scaffolding is portable: a protagonist following money through institutional layers is legible without deep local knowledge. At the same time, the specificity Variety flags — the pro-Russia inflection of the nostalgia being depicted — anchors the film firmly in a Bulgarian context that audiences in Warsaw, Berlin, or Tallinn will recognise without difficulty. The combination is one Eastern European festival programmers have favoured in recent editions, in part because it lets films function both as national commentary and as transnational genre pieces.
For Bulgarian cinema commercially, the stakes are modest but real. The country's domestic theatrical market remains small, and international festival exposure continues to be the main route by which Bulgarian features reach wider European audiences. A competition slot at Karlovy Vary, on the strength of Variety's reporting, is likely to determine whether "Black Money for White Nights" secures distribution in major European territories.
What remains uncertain
The sources available do not specify the film's runtime, its cast, its planned release date outside the festival circuit, or the financing structure behind it. Variety's coverage is also silent on whether the procedural storyline draws on specific Bulgarian corruption cases or composites them — a meaningful distinction for a film whose credibility will rest on whether audiences and critics read it as journalism-adjacent or as allegory. Festival competition entries are typically reviewed more fully after their public premieres in the days that follow, and the picture Variety paints is, by the standards of pre-premiere trade reporting, necessarily partial. What the article does establish is the film's place in the slate, its thematic orientation, and the directors' return to the same section that recognised them seven years ago.
This piece treats Variety's Karlovy Vary dispatch as the primary source, given the absence of additional trade or wire coverage in the inputs available at the time of writing. Subsequent coverage from Screen International, Cineuropa, or the Bulgarian national press may add detail not captured here.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karlovy_Vary_International_Film_Festival