At the Bishkek summit, Pezeshkian tells Modi the US "wants the war to continue"
On the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's 25th anniversary summit in Bishkek, Iran's president told India's prime minister that Washington wants the war to continue, while Modi publicly framed the meeting as a friendship-building exercise.

Bishkek's marble halls became the most crowded diplomatic crossroads in Eurasia on 31 August 2026, as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation opened its 25th anniversary summit. Within hours of the gavel falling, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian told Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that the United States is "interested in continuing war," a line carried by Iranian-aligned and BRICS-focused channels within minutes of the meeting (t.me/bricsnews/17982; t.me/Irna_en/38757). The exchange turned what was billed as a ritualistic multilateral gathering into a live read on which two non-Western heavyweights see the same geopolitical fault lines, and which two see them differently.
The optics matter because the SCO has spent a decade trying to position itself as the institutional ballast of a post-Western order, and Bishkek was the first summit at which Tehran and New Delhi sat down as full members without a Cold-War-era asterisk. Pezeshkian's framing of Washington, blunt and quotable, signals how Iran intends to use that platform. Modi's reply, choreographed through an X post hours later, signals how India intends to keep its options open (t.me/presstv/204865).
The Pezeshkian-Modi meeting, line by line
The meeting was the headline bilateral of the morning session. Footage and dispatches from Bishkek show the two leaders greeting each other before seated talks, with Indian state-aligned accounts emphasising "warmth" and Iranian accounts emphasising substance (t.me/Irna_en/38757). Pezeshkian's "continuing war" formulation, relayed through the BRICS-branded Telegram channel BRICS News, was not developed in the same thread; the surrounding messages on the channel do not specify which conflict the president was referring to (t.me/bricsnews/17982). Modi's own post on X, as carried by Press TV's Telegram mirror, framed the conversation around "strengthening India's long standing friendship" and made no reference to the United States (t.me/presstv/204865).\n That asymmetry is the story. One leader used the platform to land a line about external powers; the other used the same platform to perform continuity with a long-standing bilateral relationship. Both moves are coherent with each leader's domestic audience.
The wider Bishkek choreography
Pezeshkian and Modi were not the only principals in town. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan arrived among the first wave of leaders and exchanged greetings with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Modi on the sidelines, a reminder that the South Caucasus remains an active SCO sub-track despite the organisation's better-known Central Asia footprint (x.com/SprinterPress/status/2094392727051940334). Putin and Xi were reported to be holding a separate bilateral meeting on the margins, as relayed by the Telegram channel rnintel, with a parallel Putin-Xi encounter framed by that channel as the substantive geopolitical item of the day (t.me/rnintel/65910). The cited posts on rnintel do not specify what was discussed in that meeting, only that it was underway.
Kyrgyz hosts put on the customary arrival ritual: traditional sweets for the Iranian delegation, captured on video and circulated within the first hour of the summit's opening (x.com/SprinterPress/status/2094379579179688182). The pageantry matters because SCO summits are partly about the visible hierarchy of who lands when and who is photographed with whom. Pezeshkian's reception was at the level a sitting head of state would expect; nothing in the source material suggests a downgrade.
What the "continuing war" line actually signals
The strongest read, treating the available dispatches as evidence rather than as endorsement: Pezeshkian is signalling to a domestic Iranian audience and to the wider BRICS+ information ecosystem that Tehran's diplomatic posture in multilateral forums will keep framing the United States as a conflict-prolonging actor, and that Iran intends to use the SCO's communiqués and side-meetings as a delivery system for that message. Modi's refusal to pick up the line, at least in his public post, is the standard Indian balancing act: do not publicly align with a US-critical framing, but do not break the meeting either.
The counter-read is that this is performance rather than substance, that bilateral Iran-India trade and chabahar-port cooperation continue regardless of who says what about Washington, and that a single quoted line at a multilateral summit rarely survives contact with the next working group. Monexus's assessment: the counter-read is plausible on the bilateral track, but the SCO summit is precisely the venue where the multilateral message gets made, and Pezeshkian used it.
What to watch next
Two near-term signals will tell us whether the Bishkek meeting produced a line or a shift. First, the SCO's official summit declaration, expected at the close of the leaders' session, will indicate whether the "continuing war" framing makes it into a multilateral text or stays confined to bilateral press. The cited source items do not specify the communique's content. Second, any readout from the Putin-Xi meeting on the margins will set the geopolitical ceiling above which India and Iran calibrate their own statements. The rnintel thread confirms the meeting is underway; it does not confirm a read-out (t.me/rnintel/65910).
For now, the lasting image from Bishkek is not the family photograph but the gap between what Pezeshkian said and what Modi posted, two leaders sitting on the same stage, reading the same map, and drawing different conclusions about who is to blame for the violence on it.
How Monexus framed this vs the wire: the Western wires have not yet published a Bishkek summit dispatch as of the time of writing; Monexus built this read from Telegram and X mirrors of Iranian, BRICS-focused, and field-dispatch accounts, with the asymmetry between Pezeshkian's quoted framing and Modi's X post treated as the analytical centre of gravity.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/bricsnews/17982
- https://t.me/Irna_en/38757
- https://t.me/presstv/204865
- https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2094392727051940334
- https://t.me/rnintel/65910
- https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2094379579179688182
- https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2094379287277146576