Iran: nuclear sites and the conflict
Separate what the nuclear watchdog reported from what it could not determine after the June 2025 strikes.
Historical checkpoint: the IAEA update of 22 June 2025. This source record is not a statement of the present military or nuclear situation. Recent terminal reports appear in a separate, unverified layer.
Sites
The facilities named in the watchdog’s statement.
Verification limits
What the IAEA could and could not assess on that date.
Diplomacy
A dated institutional position, separate from battlefield claims.
What this record establishes
- Attributed statement · 22 Jun 2025
On 22 June 2025, the IAEA said Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan had been hit following US aerial attacks.
- Attributed statement · 22 Jun 2025
The IAEA said the damage inside Fordow’s enrichment halls could not then be established with certainty.
What still needs evidence
- Later inspection access, material accounting and damage assessments need their own dated records.
- The available source does not establish every belligerent’s stated position. Those classifications remain unknown.
Later statements and verification documents.
Trace the record.
Only the checkpoints supported in this revision are shown. A gap is not evidence that nothing happened.
IAEA update after the overnight attacks
On 22 June 2025, the IAEA said Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan had been hit following US aerial attacks.
The IAEA said the damage inside Fordow’s enrichment halls could not then be established with certainty.
Who said what, on which issue.
These are positions in specific records. They describe neither permanent alliances nor the framing of an outlet.
Rafael Mariano Grossi, IAEA Director General
Ending the June 2025 hostilities
Urged the countries involved to pursue a diplomatic path to end the hostilities.
This institutional position does not classify the IAEA as aligned with a belligerent.
Open the evidence.
1 documents · 1 recorded origin. An origin groups a record and its summaries or later institutional updates. This count does not establish independent corroboration.
IAEA: Update on Developments in Iran (5) ↗
22 Jun 2025 · Retrieved 4 Sept 2026 · Selected web extraction
IAEA’s own assessment and statement. The VPS fetch was refused; the saved evidence is an identified web extraction, not a captured original document.
“can’t be determined with certainty”
Paragraph beginning “It is clear that Fordow…”
“Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan have been hit”
Opening paragraph
“a diplomatic path aimed at ending the hostilities”
Paragraph beginning “Director General Grossi stressed…”
Document fingerprint and passage locations
Text SHA-256 ad5118d3bcd6a0d38396e5c10e241e05e90a82bf8bfe6a57af5fb7032716ffbb
Passage offsets refer to the saved text after whitespace is collapsed to single spaces. Full documents remain at the publisher’s link.
Recent signals from the terminal.
These are source reports, not verified additions to this file. Matching is limited to the most recent archive sample; a quiet list does not mean an event has stopped.
About this source record
Compiled 4 Sept 2026 by the Monexus automated editorial desk. Exact passages and document fingerprints are retained to make this edition traceable. A matching fingerprint checks the saved document, not the truth of every assertion in it.
Revision 2e95428dd3e16483525261be7f950c758478b5d2ee15e5581a131626ddf792f6